Despite domestic and international objections the Japanese whaling fleet sets off to kill Antarctic Minke whales.

The Japanese whaling fleet left Japan on the 1st December 2015 and will be in the Southern Ocean in about 3 weeks, which coincides with Australian PM Malcolm Turnbull’s visit to Japan. The Antarctic whale hunt is expected to continue until March 2016.  The whaling fleet’s target; 333 Antarctic Minke whales, they plan to carry out this hunt every year for the next 12 years.

Embed from Getty Images

They do this despite the fact they submitted their new whaling “research’ plan only days before departing for Antarctic waters and regardless of the IWC Scientific Committee’s lack of support for the new “research” plan.

Australian Minister of Environment Mr Greg Hunt had this to say;

“…the International Whaling Commission’s Scientific Committee has raised significant questions about the science underpinning Japan’s new whaling plan, NEWREP-A, which are yet to be satisfactorily addressed…”

&

“…Japan’s decision to implement NEWREP-A before the International Whaling Commission’s review process is complete is a matter of concern. Japan cannot unilaterally decide whether it has adequately addressed the Scientific Committee’s questions.”

Embed from Getty Images

In 2014 the ICJ ruled  the previous Japanese “research” program, JAPRA 2, illegal based on its lack of scientific value and lack of participation in non-lethal research therefore not acting in accordance with with the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling.

Patrick R Ramage tweet RE japan statement to accept ICJ ruling dated 31 March 2014

Click to enlarge the image.

After originally stating they would abide by the ICJ ruling, the Japanese government has now stated it will not accept any ruling from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on any maters concerning;

 

“living resources of the sea…”

 

The decision to back away from its international obligations and agreements is a troubling one,  when you take into consideration the language used. It could well have far-reaching consequences on our planet’s oceans at a time when our marine ecosystems are under great pressure and so many marine species are reported as being on the brink of collapse.

Embed from Getty Images

 

Several Japanese welfare organizations have also questioned not only the new program, but also the taxpayer burden and the Japanese government’s decision to amend its declaration to abide by the ICJ agreement.

In a joint statement posted on the Iruka & Kujira (Dolphin & Whale) Action Network (IKA-Net) website these organisations said;

“This new plan is the same plan that the expert panel of the International Whaling Commission concluded this January did not demonstrate the need for lethal sampling. This report was further supported by 44 scientists at the IWC Scientific Committee held in May.”

The statement goes onto say;

“The initial government subsidy to research whaling at the onset of the program was 500 million yen. The amount is increasing every year, and the current amount is 3.1 billion yen… also received an additional 4.5 billion yen last term, from the Fisheries Agency…”

It then calls the Institute of Cetacean Research “deficit-laden” due to “the shrinking market for whale meat.” followed with;

“It is clear that the operation that requires going out to distant international waters cannot make a good business.”

The statement concludes with;

“We, not only being Japanese, but also citizens of the Earth, cannot dismiss such an announcement by the government like the one made to the UN last month that ignores international agreements.
We strongly demand that the government not start any new research whaling programs, and instead take on new measures that contribute to ocean conservation.”

Embed from Getty Images

Embed from Getty Images

It’s also interesting to note that part of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s election district, Shimonoseki is home to much of Japan’s whaling fleet.

Embed from Getty Images

The Japanese whaling industry has been frought with allegations of corruption. In 2008 two activists from Greenpeace Japan exposed crew members of Japan’s whaling factory ship, the Nisshin Maru, for illegally trading prime cuts of whale meat. The crew were smuggling the meat ashore for personal gain and at the tax payers expense. The public prosecutor initially investigated the allegations however in the end the “Tokyo Two” were the ones arrested.

Embed from Getty Images

 

At the time Greenpeace reported that;

“During the nearly three years it took for the case to be completed, Japanese media, human rights and environmental groups as well as politicians inside and outside Japan became increasingly convinced of the corruption within the industry. An extensive dossier outlining the investigation, containing interviews with whistleblowers from the whaling industry and documentation proving the embezzlement was presented to prosecutors and officials. Junichi and Toru’s principle defence was that taking the whale meat as evidence of the corruption was a reasonable action in order to carry out an investigation in good faith and in the public interest – as the whaling programme is funded  by tax-payers money.”

Embed from Getty Images

Embed from Getty Images

 

In a case brought by Humane Society International, Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha (KSK), the Japanese government funded whaling company, was found “guilty of wilful contempt”  This means contempt of the Australian Federal Court for conducting whaling activities in the Australian Antarctic Whale Sanctuary and was just last month fined AU$1,000,000. It is the first finding of contempt under Australia’s Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act.

KSK refuse to acknowledge this ruling.   In 2008 when the original case was heard, Humane Society chief executive Michael Kennedy said the following in an ABC news interview;

“[Kyodo] simply did not recognise the injunction; they did not recognise the law, because they don’t recognise the Australian territory in the Southern Ocean,”

The Humane Society International went onto to say the following in its ‘HSI Technical Bulletin‘;

“Despite the declaration and injunction issued in this case, ultimately enforcement of the prohibition against whaling in the Australia n Whale Sanctuary (AWS) under the EPBC Act rests on the shoulders of the new Australian Government. The Australian Government could stop the whaling by the respondent Japanese company by ordering an Australian customs or fisheries vessel to arrest the Japanese whaling company’s vessels operating in the AWS adjacent to Antarctica. Prior to being elected and prior to the injunction being issued by the Federal Court, the Australian Labor Party committed itself to “enforce Australian law banning the slaughter of whales in the Australian Whale Sanctuary”

Embed from Getty Images

Embed from Getty Images

In recent years Japanese whaling ships have  entered Australian Exclusive Economic Zones illegally whilst chasing Sea Shepherd Conservation Society ships. This has resulted in Australian authorities ordering the whaling vessels out of the EEZ.

ALL THIS AND…

Two days prior to the whaling fleets departure Australian PM Malcolm Turnbull was quoted in the Sydney Morning Herald (SMH) he said;

“we… strongly encourage Japan to cease its whaling operations…”

On the 29th November 2015, Greens spokesperson for whaling, Senator Peter Whish-Wilson questioned the Government over what they are going to do to stop Japan re-starting whaling.  The language used in the governments responses were disappointing at best.

With the Japanese whaling fleet on the move recent indications from the Australian government show there is the possibility that they may send the Customs Icebreaker, the Aurora Australis to the Southern Ocean.  Although the question still remains as to what role it would play?

Embed from Getty Images

There are recognition issues regarding zoning in the Southern Ocean and this has, in past years, been offered as a reason why Australia has not asserted itself during the previous whale hunts in the Southern Ocean.  While Malcolm Turnbull is in Paris with the very people he needs to speak with, those with claims in the region.  Shouldn’t he raise the issue? Shouldn’t he make time to talk to them, and let them know he cares about what the word ‘sanctuary’ means and then stand tall and send the Aurora Australis to the Southern Ocean?

It’s wonderful to see the British have already publicly stated their  Royal Navy ice-class vessel the HMS Protector, will be keeping an eye out for the Japanese whaling fleet while it conducts fisheries patrols in the Southern Ocean.

Embed from Getty Images

Some are even calling for whaling to be prioritized in trade negations.  Senator Peter Whish-Wilson during an SBS interview, suggested the Australian government move away from legal diplomacy and onto diplomacy within trade agreements via the use of incentives or disincentives depending on how you want to see it.

On 30th November (the day prior to the Whaling fleet departing) Japan submitted a bid along with two others tenders, for a lucrative contract to supply a new fleet of submarines for the Australian Navy. This opens up an opportunity for Australia to tell the Japanese government that, while it continues to hunt whales, Australia will not consider any such tenders. 

There has been some speculation regarding whether  Sea Shepherd Conservation Society (SSCS) would participate in anti-whaling activities after Japan’s latest departure.

On 9th November 2015 SSCS announced its second campaign to stop illegal fishing for toothfish aka “Chilean Sea Bass,” in the Southern Ocean, Operation Icefish

“will once again focus its attention on defending the pristine waters of Antarctica, with the aim to eliminate illegal fishing of vulnerable toothfish from the region.”

The speculation was magnified by this article from SMH which states

‘…the anti-whaling activists of Sea Shepherd said they would not be chasing the whaling fleet this summer, with two of their ships in dry dock, and a third, the Melbourne-based Steve Irwin, hunting illegal Antarctic fishers.”

However, shortly after the whaling fleet left Japan SSCS announced a new anti-whaling campaign with a difference, Operation Ultimate Justice.

“For years, Sea Shepherd took direct action against the whalers on the seas, saving one whale at a time from the Japanese harpoons,” said Sea Shepherd Founder Captain Paul Watson. “But if we are to bring the illegal slaughter to an end once and for all, we cannot simply defeat the Japanese whalers on the water; we need to defeat them in the courts.”

Embed from Getty Images

It remains to be seen what the SSCS flagship, Steve Irwin will do if during Operation Icefish they happen to come across any of the Japanese Whaling Fleet.

One thing is for sure, if you are an Aussie that doesn’t support whaling and want to see your government do more to stop it from happening in Antarctic waters, you need to speak up, get in touch with your local federal MP and let them know this is an important issue to you and you want to see Australia do more, you want to see the whaling issue prioritized and discussed when talking trade with Japan.  And it’s not just the Australians who need to raise their voices, those of you out there who want to see and end to whaling.  It’s time to make some noise.

Embed from Getty Images

 

Red Cove 9th October 2015

Image

 

151009 Red Cove

 

The fourth drive of dolphins into the infamous “Cove” just happened.  An entire family pod of Rissos dolphins estimated to be between 15-20 dolphins were slaughtered for human consumption.  The numbers will be confirmed after all photographs and footage have been reviewed by those bearing witness to the hunts in Taiji, Japan.  Currently there are observers from Sea Shephered Cove Guardians & Ric O’Barry’s Dolphin Project in Taiji.

The hunt, drive and slaughter took about 6 hours and approximately 3 of those hours was spent harassing the dolphins from the start of the drive to the point of slaughter.  Dolphins were witnessed and photographed bloodied and entangled in nets.  Claims that this process is fast and painless are false.  Marine mammals in Japan are not covered by any animal welfare laws, unlike other mammals considered to be acceptable for human consumption.  The comparison between animals consumed by humans is not a valid one until they are all covered by the same animal welfare considerations and laws.  You can help the current Japanese animal welfare organizations asking for the laws to include marine mammals by signing this petition.

Although today’s hunt was exclusively about the dolphin meat trade, the money earned by the hunters for the meat trade is far less than that made by the live sales to the captive industry, and therefore the hunts themselves are mainly funded by the income off the captive marine mammal industry.  You can help make a difference by never buying a ticket to see or swim with captive dolphins.  Tanks?  No Thanks!

Blue & Red Cove Days this season as at the latest update 9/10/2015;

Blue Cove 151008

33 Blue Cove Days with the longest run of consecutive days at 15.

Red Cove151008

 

 

 

 

4 Red Cove Days with the longest run of consecutive days at 2.

 

 

The Taiji Dolphin Drive Hunt Seasonal Data page has been updated as at the 9th October 2015 and compares the season data, as well as the monthly data in charts for the Taiji dolphin drive hunts going back to 2011/2012 hunting season.

Last Updated 9/10/2015

4 Season Comparrison Data BC JAX WATERMARKD

Seaworld and alike, isn’t it time you put your money where your mouth is with regards to conservation?

Reading the recent article about the demise and what some researchers and scientists believe is the inevitable extinction of the Maui’s Dolphin.  The world smallest Dolphin only found in New Zealand’s waters.  Got me thinking about my country’s Snubfin Dolphins having read back in 2011 that some believe they are on a course towards extinction as well.  That was 2 years ago and the current Australian government is “streamlining” all environmental processes, reducing protections against industrialization and fishing, the massive increase of ports and future shipping lanes in areas that are home to the Snubfin Dolphin and of course ignoring the World Heritage Committee warning about downgrading the current listing to “under threat” in the Great Barrier Reef.  The possible return of the super-trawler, oh the list just goes on and I am sure it’s not just Australia and New Zealand’s dolphins and other marine life that are under threat from so many angles.

With the release of books and films such as: “Death at SeaWorld” by David Kirby, “A Fall from Freedom” by EarthViews Productions , “The Cove” by Louie Psihoyos,  “Blackfish” by Gabriela Cowperthwaite  so many people are seeing some of the more deliberately hidden aspects involved in keeping Orca captive, regardless of which facility they are in and many are deciding it’s cruelty and an industry that they no longer want to support.

However, a lot of people don’t realise that an Orca is actually the largest member of the forty species of dolphin in 17 genera (due to the deceptive name Killer Whale, funnily enough used by so called educational captive facilities).  This to me really means, that although of the smaller species of dolphin may appear due to their size, not require as large a holding spaces (such as sea pens, lagoons, pools and tanks) however, they still have the same basic physical and emotional needs as their larger counterparts the Orca.  So I believe that the evidence that Orca are not suitable to captivity represented in the film “Blackfish” would also apply to all dolphins.

So SeaWorld and every other captive facility showing dolphins, if you are serious about conservation, why are your dolphin breeding programs only about keeping captive facilities re-stocked.  Why aren’t you spending your time and money on the research and science behind rescue, rehabilitation and “RELEASE” of dolphins.  Isn’t your end goal the conservation of the species?  With the public becoming more aware, what you should have worked out by now (if you haven’t already,) is that the real education coming from decades of the captive industry is, these animals do not do well in captivity.

I think with what appears to be a shift in mainstream attitude towards the marine mammal captive industry, if SeaWorld is really to put some backbone behind their conservation cries, it’s time for them to do the right thing and start actually getting their dolphins into sea pens, and working on the science behind rehabilitation and release.  We’ve had 40 years of research on how to keep them captive which is looking more and more like a failed experiment with very little of that time being spent on how to rescue with release as the end result in comparison.

For those that say it can’t be done, recently there have been attempts (but certainly not enough of them) some undeniably successful  such as; 2 bottlenose dolphins Tom & Misha rescued form Hisaronu, Turkey by The Borne Free Foundation, 3 bottlenose Jedol, Chunsam and Sampal released back to their pods in South Korea by Ric O’Barry’s Dolphin Project and some releases where the success of the releases has been debated such as Keiko the Orca, who was the star of the film “Free Willy” and was rehabbed and released by the The Free Willy Foundation. For those that didn’t notice, take note that none, of the attempts to rehabilitation mentioned for release were carried out by SeaWorld, although there may be one or two cetacean releases by SeaWorld, I was unable to find any media on them to be able to make comment of them.

If you look at the world news with regards to marine issues, it’s not hard to see that our planet’s oceans are in trouble, despite the education places like SeaWorld profess to be delivering.  Currently there aren’t any worldwide studies of dolphin populations, however it isn’t hard to see dolphins are in trouble, when you look at individual populations and collect all the dots.  Come on SeaWorld what are you really about, circus performances for entertainment or the conservation of our oceans and marine life?

Captive Marine Mammals, where do they get them?

Gallery

“No aquarium, no tank in a marine land, however spacious it may be, can begin to duplicate the conditions of the sea. And no dolphin who inhabits one of those aquariums or one of those marine lands can be considered … Continue reading

just choose one thing

A couple of New Year’s Eve’s ago I made a resolution to myself and it has lead me down a road that has been painful, liberating, horrific and rewarding, and I haven’t looked back… I promised myself I would be vocal about the things going on around me that really upset and concerned me.  The next year I decided to choose one thing I care about whether it be a human rights issue, animal rights issue or environmental issue it didn’t (and still doesn’t) matter what it was, research the issue, educate myself as to why it was happening, who it was that behind it and who else was benefiting from it, what could be done to change the practice and make it ethical, AND then most importantly stop giving putting my consumer dollars into their pockets because I wanted to remove myself from the problem.  I am still trying this.  It’s harder than it seems with big umbrella corporations linking so many products together and mainstream media again leading back to only a few people connected to the corporate world, assisting with hiding or at least providing bias opinion regarding the facts, at times.

In the last few years I have revisited a few issues that I have cared about since my childhood. This is where the first three issues I am focusing on.

  • I grew up in South East Asia and have always felt a strong connection to my childhood years in Indonesia.  With memories, of Sumatran Tigers and Orang-utans still vivid today.  I already knew the palm oil industry was a major player in the loss of habitat for both these endangered creatures.  What I didn’t realise was how many products contain palm oil and all the other issues facing these two amazing animals.
  • Last year my father told me that when I was really quite young at the end of the day, he would announce it was bath time and I would be very inquisitive as to if there would be a whale in my bath tub.  When I asked him if it was excitement or concern at that prospect he says I wasn’t excited, possibly a little concerned but more just interested.  My interested in the whales quickly grew from whales to dolphins, turtles, coral reefs, sharks and so on and so on, throughout my life.
  • As a child my father took me snorkeling at a small Malaysian island called Tioman, I feel in love with the ocean there and turtles were my favourite.

So this will be my attempt to share the idea.  This blog is a place, where I can put my research, thoughts and discoveries on a journey to match my dollars, my voice and my ethics.